For anybody observing their activity from Google, it's not by any stretch of the imagination a disclosure that a solitary page can rank for hundreds (or even thousands) of applicable catchphrases.

Be that as it may, what number of catchphrases precisely will a normal page rank for?

That is the issue we needed to reply (in addition to a couple of all the more), so we picked 3 million arbitrary pursuit inquiries and took a gander at the best positioning pages and what number of different catchphrases they rank for.

How about we make a plunge Traffic Xtractor 2.0 Review

What number of watchwords do the top20 positioning pages "additionally rank for"?

Here are the normal and middle quantities of watchwords that we saw top20 pages "additionally rank for" (contemplated crosswise over 3 million pursuit questions):


By saying "likewise rank for," I really signify "additionally rank for in top10." For in case you're not in the top10 query items for a given watchword, you're scarcely getting any activity from it.

It would appear that the normal #1 positioning page will likewise rank in the top10 for about 1,000 other important watchwords (while the middle esteem is more than two times littler — around 400 catchphrases).

Furthermore, the lower positioning pages tend to rank for less watchwords.

We have additionally considered three gatherings of catchphrases independently:

1. all catchphrases in our example;

2. keywords with seek volume more than 1,000 quests for each month;

3. keywords with look volume more than 10,000 pursuits for every month.

We needed to know whether positioning for a more mainstream watchword would bring about positioning for a bigger number of applicable catchphrases. Which seemed, by all accounts, to be precisely the case.

The anomalies

It's constantly amusing to take a gander at anomalies, correct?


Anomalies are the genuine motivation behind why we contemplate normal and middle numbers independently. Many pages rank for a colossal measure of catchphrases, which drives the "normal" numbers up. For the past trial, we expelled the greatest anomalies to make the information more illustrative, however and, after its all said and done, the hole amongst normal and middle esteems was very significant.

So how about we see which pages rank in Google for a tremendous measure of catchphrases.

Top10 pages by the quantity of "likewise rank for in top100" catchphrases (over all nations):

1. (192184) nsfw

2. (139245)

3. (131597)

4. (118070)

5. (113957)

6. (113927)

7. (108972)

8. (104940),2817,2476563,00.asp

9. (100558)

10. (91594)

Top10 pages by the quantity of "additionally rank for at #1" catchphrases (over all nations):

1. (49804)

2. (34930)

3. (30420)

4. (27851)

5. (25639)

6. (24769) nsfw

7. (22078) nsfw

8. (21588)

9. (21584)

10. (20613)

You can put any of these URLs into Ahrefs' Site Explorer apparatus and explore to the "Natural catchphrases" answer to see every one of the watchwords they rank for.

Furthermore, in light of these exception URLs, it would seem that downloading content from YouTube is one of the essential issues that trouble humankind nowadays:

Little BONUS

I've just recorded the top10 anomalies, yet in the event that you need to get the top100, here you go (no select in required):

• Top100 URLs by "likewise rank for in top100" watchwords: Global/US.

• Top100 URLs by "likewise rank for at #1" watchwords: Global/US.

Research these pages with Ahrefs' Site Explorer and gain from their prosperity.

What number of high-volume watchwords can you "likewise rank for"?

There's nothing amazing about positioning for a huge number of long-tail catchphrases with a solitary page.

Be that as it may, shouldn't something be said about the high-volume catchphrases? What number of them can a solitary page rank for?

To think about this Graphic Azura Vol 2 Review, we took every one of the pages from our example that positioned #1 for a 10k+ catchphrase and took a gander at what number of other 10k+ watchwords these pages likewise positioned for (at position #1).

We at that point recreated a comparable trial for pages that positioned #1 for 1k+ catchphrases.

What's more, this is what we got:

Obviously, the greater part of URLs have positioned #1 for a solitary high-volume watchword.

Be that as it may, the crude numbers on the above diagram may appear somewhat deceptive, in light of the fact that it's difficult to put them on a similar scale.

So we have figured what % of pages in our example positioned at the best for one catchphrase, two watchwords, three watchwords, and so forth.

Also, got these cool pie outlines:

For reasons unknown positioning for 2– 3 watchwords with more than 1,000 ventures for each month is very normal. While positioning for more than one 10k+ watchword with a solitary page is exceptionally uncommon.

How might you rank for more catchphrases with your page?

As you can presumably tell by taking a gander at the previously mentioned exceptions, the most ideal approach to rank for more catchphrases is to pick the correct point.

Certain subjects have a tendency to have a tremendous pursuit request and a huge amount of pertinent inquiry questions, while others basically aren't sufficiently prevalent to give you an assortment of watchword looks.

We've shrouded this in our manual for long-tail catchphrases, however I get it won't hurt to say it once more.

Research movement potential

When arranging your substance, don't simply take a gander at the inquiry volume of the essential watchword you're focusing on. You should pull the best positioning pages for that catchphrase and perceive what number of different watchwords they likewise rank for and how much pursuit movement it brings them.

I regularly utilize the watchword "I'm sad blooms" to delineate that.

The month to month seek volume of this catchphrase is just 250 pursuits for every month, which may appear that it does not merit focusing on.

However, in the event that you take a gander at the best positioning pages for that catchphrase (which you can do with Ahrefs' Keywords Explorer) you'll see this:

The top5 positioning pages for the watchword "I'm sad blooms" likewise rank for more than 50 other significant catchphrases, which brings each of them around a hundred exceedingly focused on guests every month.


We have a vast database of watchwords at Ahrefs, however it is difficult to incorporate all the current hunt inquiries there. That is the reason Ahrefs dependably disparages the measure of catchphrases that a page is positioning for and the measure of movement it brings. Which implies the genuine hunt activity to a given page will dependably be greater than what we gauge.

So on the off chance that you stay with the old way to deal with watchword examine, you'll conclude that it's not worth positioning in top5 for the catchphrase "I'm sad blossoms."

Also, on the off chance that you receive this new procedure, you'll be getting around a hundred very focused on guests every month from positioning anyplace in the top5 for this catchphrase.

In any case, aside from finding the point with high movement potential, what else would you be able to do to augment the measure of catchphrases that your page will rank for?

Does content length help?

To give you the response to this inquiry, we have disseminated all pages in our example measure into 5 pails by their substance length and took a gander at the normal number of catchphrases they "additionally positioned for in the top10":

It would appear that more drawn out shape content tends to rank for more catchphrases, which isn't amazing in any capacity.

Yet, at that point we went somewhat more granular and took a gander at the measure of watchwords that positioned at position #1 for each can:

Furthermore, still longer frame content performed better.

Do backlinks help?

There were many examinations (our own incorporated) that demonstrated a somewhat high connection between's the backlink components of a page and its Google rankings.

Be that as it may, I don't think I've seen an investigation of how backlink factors associate with the quantity of catchphrases that a page positions for.

So we made 5 cans by URL Rating (which indicates how solid the backlink profile of a given URL is) and taken a gander at the normal number of "additionally rank for in top10" catchphrases for each of them:

The above chart demonstrates a really solid connection between's URL Rating of a page and the quantity of catchphrases that it positions for in the top10.

We additionally went somewhat more granular and took a gander at the catchphrases positioning at position #1:

What's more, still, pages with a more grounded backlink profile performed better.


This is only a brisk update that connection does not infer causation. So the above research doesn't enable us to state that backlinks enable you to rank for more catchphrases. Everything we can state is that pages with more backlinks tend to rank for a bigger number of watchwords.

How extraordinary are the "likewise rank for" catchphrases?

What we needed to examine in this last analysis was what number of scan inquiries a page positions for have:

• 1 basic word;

• 2 basic words;

• 3 basic words;

• 4 basic words, and so forth.

Our objective was to perceive what number of watchwords that a page positions for are exceptional to the point where they don't have even a solitary normal catchphrase with whatever remains of the gathering.

This specific investigation was somewhat dubious to contemplate and picture, however subsequent to playing with the information for some time, we got this:

As should be obvious from that diagram over, the quantity of "exceptional" watchwords (that don't have even a solitary regular word with others) is amazingly low.

Which significantly additionally bolsters the way that positioning for an immense number of catchphrases is tied in with picking a well known point, which individuals would look for with similar words yet extraordinary inquiry questions — rather than focusing on numerous diverse themes with one page.

The End

So that was our (somewhat short) research of the "likewise rank for" watchwords and I trust you've taken in something from it.

Tell me in the remarks which takeaway you delighted in the most and if any of our examinations have brought up additionally issues that you might want us to reply with some subsequent research.

All Posts

Almost done…

We just sent you an email. Please click the link in the email to confirm your subscription!

OKSubscriptions powered by Strikingly